"Even if plaintiff's allegations were true, an individual's status as a public official does not, as plaintiff contends, 'make exemption 6 irrelevant to him and his vital records.'"
He said he would "disregard" documents from theSelectiveServiceand the Social Security Number Verification System suggesting there are problems with Obama's number, because he "concludes" they were obtained "under false pretenses."
Taitz told WND she is submitting a motion for reconsideration based on new evidence that includes an affidavit from an individual who obtained a government affirmation that the number Obama is using doesn't match his name.
She said it is important to the public, because it could provide evidence of fraudulentIRSreturns, fake election documents and Social Security fraud, should the allegations prove accurate.
Read more:Judge rules on Obama's Social Security Numberhttp://www.wnd.com/?pageId=339629#ixzz1WdBUYT6B
