This is Ligonier's friendly neighborhood blog and an attempt to recapture our lively opinionated debates in a free speech zone.

Please join our conversations. Contributors welcome.


claysh@gmail.com

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

US Department of Interior criticises State over Keystone XL impact report

"The US Department of the Interior has criticised as "inaccurate" the State Department's draft conclusions that the impact of the Keystone XL pipeline on wildlife would be temporary, and has warned instead that it could have long-term, adversarial effects. It is the second major government body to publicly criticise State's draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), a much contested document which examines the pipeline's potential impact on the natural environment, endangered species, communities and the economy. The DEIS, published in March, concluded that the project would only have a temporary and indirect impact on wildlife. A 12-page letter, dated 29 April by the Interior Department's Office of Environmental Protection and Compliance and posted on the department's website on 15 August, warned that some effects of the pipeline on wildlife may be permanent.

In the letter, the Department of the Interior repeatedly takes issue with the conclusions of its fellow agency that any impact on wildlife would be short-lived and occur only during construction. The Keystone pipeline, which will transport oil-sands bitumen from Canada across thousands of miles to Nebraska, requires a presidential permit from the State Department, because it crosses the US border. The Interior letter lists several potential permanent threats to wildlife, including "loss of habitat, habitat fragmentation, species displacement, barrier effect, etc", and says that the DEIS's conclusion that "permanent impacts are not expected" in terms of wildlife is not accurate."

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/20/interior-state-keystone-xl-pipeline-impact


We are wildlife...and we depend on there being vast, untouched, intact areas of wilderness. We are so close to cutting this whole magnificent 4+ billion year starship journey short, for all practical (e.g., human) purposes... . The separation of humans from (and putting them in dominion over) everything else has essentially failed when the true costs* are calculated. 

Let's try other, cooperative ways of existence, shall we?

http://www.utne.com/2004-08-01/TrueCostEconomics.aspx#axzz2caKag3cG